On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 03:31:37 +0000 "Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > } > > > > I would be better to fix this for real at those three client code sites? > > Then 5.19 will break for a while to wait for the final BIG patch ? If that's the proposal then your [1/2] should have had a cc:stable and changelog words describing the plan for 6.0. But before we do that I'd like to see at least a prototype of the final fixes to s390 and hugetlb, so we can assess those as preferable for backporting. I don't think they'll be terribly intrusive or risky?
