Re: remove iomap_writepage v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 11:32:06PM +0200, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
> Am Mi., 10. Aug. 2022 um 22:57 Uhr schrieb Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 11:31:50AM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > XFS hasn't had a ->writepage call for a while. After LSF I internally
> > > tested dropping btrfs' callback, and the results looked good: no OOM
> > > kills with dirty/writeback pages remaining, performance parity. Then I
> > > went on vacation and Christoph beat me to the patch :)
> >
> > To avoid duplicating work with you or Christoph ... it seems like the
> > plan is to kill ->writepage entirely soon, so there's no point in me
> > doing a sweep of all the filesystems to convert ->writepage to
> > ->write_folio, correct?
> >
> > I assume the plan for filesystems which have a writepage but don't have
> > a ->writepages (9p, adfs, affs, bfs, ecryptfs, gfs2, hostfs, jfs, minix,
> > nilfs2, ntfs, ocfs2, reiserfs, sysv, ubifs, udf, ufs, vboxsf) is to give
> > them a writepages, modelled on iomap_writepages().  Seems that adding
> > a block_writepages() might be a useful thing for me to do?
> 
> Hmm, gfs2 does have gfs2_writepages() and gfs2_jdata_writepages()
> functions, so it should probably be fine.

Ah, it's gfs2_aspace_writepage which doesn't have a writepages
counterpart.  I haven't looked at it to understand why it's needed.
(gfs2_meta_aops and gfs2_rgrp_aops)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux