On 7/19/22 17:59, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > Dave, Andy, any position on this? > > I wrote LAM_U48 support to prove that interface is flexible enough, but I > see why it can be a problem if a distro will pick them up ahead of > upstream. My position is that maintaining distro forks is troublesome. If you held a gun to my head today and made me merge *something* I'd leave out the U48 patch, but reserve the right to add it later. I'm not sure whether that makes the distros lives easier or harder. I'm not promising anything either way, though.
