On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 1:13 AM Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Linear Address Masking[1] (LAM) modifies the checking that is applied to > 64-bit linear addresses, allowing software to use of the untranslated > address bits for metadata. > > The patchset brings support for LAM for userspace addresses. > > LAM_U48 enabling is controversial since it competes for bits with > 5-level paging. Its enabling isolated into an optional last patch that > can be applied at maintainer's discretion. I believe having optional patches will put unnecessary burden on distro maintainers. Soon after landing U48 support other changes will start piling on top of it, and it will be impossible to maintain a kernel with this patch removed. It also won't make any difference for the upstream, where this patch will be always present. We'd better decide now whether we need U48 or not, and either keep it or delete it.
