On 7/19/22 21:11, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 20:17:45 -0400
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
More specific please.
Steve, look at the man page for snprintf if you don't see what I mean.
This discussion has become entirely too tedious, and your _only_
contribution to the discussion on pretty-printers has been "why isn't
this using this thing I made?".
No, my response is, why should we replace something that is working
just fine?
For you. For your code.
Look, Steve, I've tried to work with you. And I've given you reasons why
seq_buf doesn't work for vsprintf.c, and more general cases. You have
not responded _at all_ with technical reasons or discussion, all you've
done from the very start is lecture me on process.
And, to be blunt, the time to have the printbuf vs. seq_buf discussion
was months ago. I tried to start that discussion with you, and you
ghosted on IRC when I started talking about the things in seq_buf that
would have to change.
Like I said, I'll CC you when v5 is posted.
