On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 19:43:46 -0400 Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 7/19/22 19:15, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Sun, 19 Jun 2022 20:41:59 -0400 > > Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Core idea: Wouldn't it be nice if we had a common data structure and calling > >> convention for outputting strings? > > > > Because seq_buf gives us this already, the cover letter really just needs > > to state exactly what the benefit is to replace seq_buf with printbuf (and > > why seq_buf can not be simply extended to do some extra features). > > - seq_buf has the wrong semantics on overflow for what vsnprintf needs. More specific please. > - seq_buf is somewhat unnecessarily coupled to tracing needs - the > readpos member has nothing to do with outputting formatting strings, and > some of the pretty-printers are tracing specific and don't really belong > in a generic pretty-printing library. That's not really a benefit between the two. > > And, when I tried to talk to you about changing seq_buf to be more > suitable you didn't respond - you just dropped off the IRC discussion we > were having. I told you I've been swamped and this wasn't the best time for me. I can't drop everything for you. > > > > > I just applied your series and ran the tracing selftests and several of > > them failed. > > > > # cd tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ > > # ./ftracetest > > Thank you for telling me where to find the tests. It would've saved us > some back and forth (and I could've gotten on this sooner) if you'd > responded when I asked before. It's in kernel selftests, they are not hard to find. > > It may seem like the perfectly natural place to look to you - who works > on the code - but to someone who works on a variety of subsystems, each > of which puts their test code (if they have any!) in a different place, > it wasn't. All the subsystems tests should be in tools/testing/selftests this isn't just where tracing goes. It's the standard place. > > However, when I enabled all the tracing kernel config options, your > tests are now failing to run at all with: > > db_root: cannot open: /etc/target > > So now I've got to debug your tests, too. Gah. WTF? -- Steve