On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 11:25:35AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 03:23:25PM -0700, Isaac Manjarres wrote: > > isn't present. So, the current behavior that crypto is relying on > > wouldn't change, so I agree with Catalin that we wouldn't be lying to > > the compiler if we move forward with getting rid of kmalloc-192. > > There is no guarantee that crypto will always be allocating > structures > 128 bytes. > > But thanks for the reminder, I do need to push the patches along. So do I but holidays get in the way ;). I plan to refresh my kmalloc minalign series at the end of August. One significant change I have though is that now ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN now goes down all the way to 8 and using swiotlb bounce buffering if the DMA mapping size is small. -- Catalin
