On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 04:11:22PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 01:31:32PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > > This needs a clarification. For the above structure, kmalloc() will > > return a 128-byte aligned pointer since sizeof(x) is a multiple of 128. > > The potential problem is if you have something like: > > > > kmalloc(sizeof(struct x) + 64); > > > > The above could end up as a kmalloc(192) which is available with an > > ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN of 64. If that's a real use-case, I can change the > > slab patch to not create the 192 (or 48 if we go for an even smaller > > ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN) caches and we'd always have ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN > > guarantee if the structure itself is correctly aligned. No lying to the > > compiler. > > Yes I suppose that should work: > > 1) Enlarge each crypto API object so that they're >= 128 bytes; I don't think we need to do anything here. A structure like: struct x { char y; char z[] CRYPTO_MINALIGN_ATTR; }; is already of size 128. Without CRYPTO_MINALIGN_ATTR, its size would be 1 but otherwise the whole structure inherits the alignment of its member and this translates into an aligned size. > 2) Modify kmalloc so that for sizes >= 128 bytes they're padded > to multiples of 128. This doesn't look like a hack, we want to honour the power of 2 alignments. -- Catalin