On 07/04/22 10:33, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> From: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@xxxxxxx>
>
> follow_pud_mask() does not support non-present pud entry now. As long as
> I tested on x86_64 server, follow_pud_mask() still simply returns
> no_page_table() for non-present_pud_entry() due to pud_bad(), so no severe
> user-visible effect should happen. But generally we should call
> follow_huge_pud() for non-present pud entry for 1GB hugetlb page.
>
> Update pud_huge() and follow_huge_pud() to handle non-present pud entries.
> The changes are similar to previous works for pud entries commit e66f17ff7177
> ("mm/hugetlb: take page table lock in follow_huge_pmd()") and commit
> cbef8478bee5 ("mm/hugetlb: pmd_huge() returns true for non-present hugepage").
>
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2 -> v3:
> - fixed typos in subject and description,
> - added comment on pud_huge(),
> - added comment about fallback for hwpoisoned entry,
> - updated initial check about FOLL_{PIN,GET} flags.
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 8 +++++++-
> mm/hugetlb.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
Mike Kravetz
