Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > si->inuse_pages could still be accessed concurrently now. The plain reads > outside si->lock critical section, i.e. swap_show and si_swapinfo, which > results in data races. But these should be ok because they're just used > for showing swap info. > > Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > mm/swapfile.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c > index d2bead7b8b70..3fa26f6971e9 100644 > --- a/mm/swapfile.c > +++ b/mm/swapfile.c > @@ -2646,7 +2646,7 @@ static int swap_show(struct seq_file *swap, void *v) > } > > bytes = si->pages << (PAGE_SHIFT - 10); > - inuse = si->inuse_pages << (PAGE_SHIFT - 10); > + inuse = READ_ONCE(si->inuse_pages) << (PAGE_SHIFT - 10); > > file = si->swap_file; > len = seq_file_path(swap, file, " \t\n\\"); > @@ -3265,7 +3265,7 @@ void si_swapinfo(struct sysinfo *val) > struct swap_info_struct *si = swap_info[type]; > > if ((si->flags & SWP_USED) && !(si->flags & SWP_WRITEOK)) > - nr_to_be_unused += si->inuse_pages; > + nr_to_be_unused += READ_ONCE(si->inuse_pages); > } > val->freeswap = atomic_long_read(&nr_swap_pages) + nr_to_be_unused; > val->totalswap = total_swap_pages + nr_to_be_unused; READ_ONCE() should be paired with WRITE_ONCE(). So, change the writer side too? Best Regards, Huang, Ying
