> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 8:45 PM <wang.yi59@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > - change the bitmap_remap() as this patch did, but this changed the > > behavior of this routine which looks does the right thing. One good > > news is this function is only called by mpol_rebind_nodemask(). > > There are users of bitmap_remap() in drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c > > > - don't change the bitmap_remap(), to be honest, I didn't figure out > > a way. Any suggestions? > > I haven't had a chance to play with it (because of my dayjob), but I > have a strong feeling that the proper solution should come from > existing functionality. > > Did you experiment with MPOL_F_{STATIC,RELATIVE}_NODES? > Those flags enable nodes_and() and mpol_relative_nodemask() > paths correspondingly. > You are right, adding MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES can fix this situation. So it seems that we don't need to do anything in kernel now. Many thanks for your time :) > What I suggested is: > > 328 node_clear(1, pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed); > 329 node_clear(3, pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed); > 330 nodes_remap(tmp, pol->nodes, pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed, > 331 *nodes); > 332 pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed = *nodes; > > > In the example above, if set cpuset.mems to 0,2 firstly, the nodes > > binds will change from 1 to 2. And then set cpuset.mems to 1,3, it will > > change from 2 to 3 again. --- Best wishes Yi Wang