On Wed, 2022-06-08 at 13:54 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K V wrote: > On 6/8/22 12:46 PM, Ying Huang wrote: > > On Fri, 2022-05-27 at 17:55 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > > +static int __init memory_tier_init(void) > > > +{ > > > + int ret; > > > + > > > + ret = subsys_system_register(&memory_tier_subsys, memory_tier_attr_groups); > > > + if (ret) > > > + panic("%s() failed to register subsystem: %d\n", __func__, ret); > > > > I don't think we should go panic for failing to register subsys and > > device for memory tiers. Just pr_err() should be enough. > > > > So you are suggesting we continue to work with memory tiers with no > userspace interface? Yes. We don't need to panic system for this. Best Regards, Huang, Ying > > > + > > > + /* > > > + * Register only default memory tier to hide all empty > > > + * memory tier from sysfs. > > > + */ > > > + ret = register_memory_tier(DEFAULT_MEMORY_TIER); > > > + if (ret) > > > + panic("%s() failed to register memory tier: %d\n", __func__, ret); > > > + > > > + /* > > > + * CPU only nodes are not part of memoty tiers. > > > + */ > > > + memory_tiers[DEFAULT_MEMORY_TIER]->nodelist = node_states[N_MEMORY]; > > > + > > > + return 0; > > > +} > > > +subsys_initcall(memory_tier_init); > > > + > > > +#endif /* CONFIG_TIERED_MEMORY */ > > > > >