Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/7] mm/demotion: Add support for explicit memory tiers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/8/22 12:46 PM, Ying Huang wrote:
On Fri, 2022-05-27 at 17:55 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:

[snip]


+static int __init memory_tier_init(void)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = subsys_system_register(&memory_tier_subsys, memory_tier_attr_groups);
+	if (ret)
+		panic("%s() failed to register subsystem: %d\n", __func__, ret);

I don't think we should go panic for failing to register subsys and
device for memory tiers.  Just pr_err() should be enough.


So you are suggesting we continue to work with memory tiers with no userspace interface?

+
+	/*
+	 * Register only default memory tier to hide all empty
+	 * memory tier from sysfs.
+	 */
+	ret = register_memory_tier(DEFAULT_MEMORY_TIER);
+	if (ret)
+		panic("%s() failed to register memory tier: %d\n", __func__, ret);
+
+	/*
+	 * CPU only nodes are not part of memoty tiers.
+	 */
+	memory_tiers[DEFAULT_MEMORY_TIER]->nodelist = node_states[N_MEMORY];
+
+	return 0;
+}
+subsys_initcall(memory_tier_init);
+
+#endif	/* CONFIG_TIERED_MEMORY */







[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux