On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 11:34:46AM +0200, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote: > It implies that __alloc_vmap_area() allocates only from the > global vmap space, therefore a list-head and rb-tree, which > represent a free vmap space, are not passed as parameters to > this function and are accessed directly from this function. Yes, which totally makes sense. > Extend the __alloc_vmap_area() and other dependent functions > to have a possibility to allocate from different trees making > an interface common and not specific. Which seems completely pointless. Why add argument that are always passed the same values?
