On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 12:41:15PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 11:38:17AM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
> > index ad9f16689419..c1f734ab86b3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
> > @@ -812,7 +812,7 @@ int bch_btree_cache_alloc(struct cache_set *c)
> > c->shrink.seeks = 4;
> > c->shrink.batch = c->btree_pages * 2;
> >
> > - if (register_shrinker(&c->shrink))
> > + if (register_shrinker(&c->shrink, "btree"))
> > pr_warn("bcache: %s: could not register shrinker\n",
> > __func__);
>
> These drivers need better names for their shrinkers - there will often be
> multiple instances in use on a system and we need to distinguish.
>
> Also, "btree" isn't a good name for the bcache shrinker - "bcache-%pU",
> c->set_uuid would be a good name for bcache's shrinker, it'll match up with the
> cache set directory in /sys/fs/bcache/.
Sure, will improve in the next version. Thanks!
>
> For others (device mapper, md, etc.) there should be a minor device number you
> can reference.
Good point, will think of it.
Thank you for taking a look!
