On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 04:16:45AM +0000, Brian Cain wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> > ... > > As a side note... Brian, is there any reason for 256K pages to exist for > > Hexagon? This has been an option since Hexagon's introduction but is it > > actually used? 4K pages is the default and the help text says "use with > > caution". Perhaps the choice should be turned off altogether for > > CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST so that we cannot select this configuration and > > bother developers with these reports. > > It's not the most commonly used page size, yeah. Ok, we will disable it for CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST. Maybe the stack size limit could be raised for 256KB page size? Presumably the minimum stack size is 256KB, so it's not a problem for an individual function to consume 16KB of stack space?
