> -----Original Message----- > From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> ... > As a side note... Brian, is there any reason for 256K pages to exist for > Hexagon? This has been an option since Hexagon's introduction but is it > actually used? 4K pages is the default and the help text says "use with > caution". Perhaps the choice should be turned off altogether for > CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST so that we cannot select this configuration and > bother developers with these reports. It's not the most commonly used page size, yeah. Ok, we will disable it for CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST. -Brian