Re: [PATCH -next v5 1/5] mm: page_table_check: using PxD_SIZE instead of PxD_PAGE_SIZE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/21/22 11:28, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 4:02 AM Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Macro PUD_SIZE/PMD_SIZE is more general in various architectures. Using
>> PUD_SIZE/PMD_SIZE instead of PUD_PAGE_SIZE/PMD_PAGE_SIZE can better
>> support page table check in architectures other than x86 and it is no
>> functional impact on x86.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Acked-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx>


To avoid similar problems in the future, please also include the following patch after the current series:

----------------8<-------------[ cut here ]------------------

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux