On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 09:53:15AM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> On 2022/4/9 21:44, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 05:34:54PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> >> + nr_reclaimed = shrink_page_list(page_list, pgdat, &sc, &dummy_stat, false);
> >> + while (!list_empty(page_list)) {
> >> + folio = lru_to_folio(page_list);
> >> + list_del(&folio->lru);
> >> + putback_lru_page(&folio->page);
> >
> > folio_putback_lru()
>
> I thought folio_putback_lru is deliberately not to use because there is no caller of folio_putback_lru now.
> But it seems I was wrong. Will do it in next version.
Looks like all of the uses of it that I mooted during the last merge
window ended up going away.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220204195852.1751729-47-willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
was obsoleted by commit b109b87050df
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220204195852.1751729-48-willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
and
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220204195852.1751729-50-willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
were also obsoleted by Hugh's mlock changes
I also sent
https://lore.kernel.org/all/YjJJIrENYb1qFHzl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
but never quite got it up to submittable quality.
