On 4/1/22 21:25, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 1 Apr 2022, at 15:01, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 11:56 AM Zi Yan <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> How about the patch below? If it looks good, I will send v3.
>>
>> I can't see anything worrisome, but by now I've looked at several
>> versions and who knows what I'm missing.
>>
>> Making it inline and allowing a NULL 'buddy_pfn' pointer for the cases
>> that don't care might be an option, but I don't think it matters
>> hugely.
>
> What do you mean by inlining it? Moving the function and __find_buddy_pfn()
> to mm/internal.h and mark both inline?
I would prefer that for the sake of __free_one_page().
> Something like below to allow a NULL 'buddy_pfn'? buddy_pfn is needed
> to store the result of __find_buddy_pfn(). The code does not look
> as nice as before.
>
> struct page *find_buddy_page_pfn(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn,
> unsigned int order, unsigned long *buddy_pfn)
> {
> struct page *buddy;
>
> if (buddy_pfn) {
> *buddy_pfn = __find_buddy_pfn(pfn, order);
> buddy = page + (*buddy_pfn - pfn);
> } else
> buddy = page + (__find_buddy_pfn(pfn, order) - pfn);
>
> if (page_is_buddy(page, buddy, order))
> return buddy;
> return NULL;
> }
>
> or
>
> struct page *find_buddy_page_pfn(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn,
> unsigned int order, unsigned long *buddy_pfn)
> {
> struct page *buddy;
> unsigned long local_buddy_pfn = __find_buddy_pfn(pfn, order);
>
> buddy = page + (local_buddy_pfn - pfn);
> if (buddy_pfn)
> *buddy_pfn = local_buddy_pfn;
>
> if (page_is_buddy(page, buddy, order))
> return buddy;
> return NULL;
> }
The latter looks better. I would also use a name e.g. '__buddy_pfn'
instead of 'local_'.
Thanks.
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Yan, Zi
