On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 03:22:51AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 01:52:30AM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
>> @@ -1985,14 +1985,13 @@ static bool migrate_balanced_pgdat(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
>> continue;
>>
>> /* Avoid waking kswapd by allocating pages_to_migrate pages. */
>> - if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0,
>> + if (zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0,
>> high_wmark_pages(zone) +
>> nr_migrate_pages,
>> ZONE_MOVABLE, 0))
>
>Someone's done the silly thing of lining up all of these with spaces,
>so either all these lines also need to be shrunk by one space, or you
>need to break that convention and just go to a reasonable number of
>tabs. I'd do it like this:
>
> if (zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0,
> high_wmark_pages(zone) + nr_migrate_pages,
> ZONE_MOVABLE, 0))
>
>but not everybody would.
>
>> @@ -2040,16 +2040,11 @@ static int numamigrate_isolate_page(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct page *page)
>> return 0;
>>
>> /* Avoid migrating to a node that is nearly full */
>> - if (!migrate_balanced_pgdat(pgdat, nr_pages)) {
>> - int z;
>> -
>> + if ((zone = migrate_balanced_pgdat(pgdat, nr_pages))) {
>
>Linus had a rant about this style recently. He much prefers:
>
> zone = migrate_balanced_pgdat(pgdat, nr_pages);
> if (zone) {
>
>(the exception is for while loops:
>
> while ((zone = migrate_balanced_pgdat(pgdat, nr_pages)) != NULL)
>
>where he wants to see the comparison against NULL instead of the awkard
>double-bracket)
Matthew,
Thanks for your suggestion, I would change this later.
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
