On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 09:26:15PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> LRU_UNEVICTABLE is not taken into account when shrink lruvec. So we can
> save a bit of stack space by shrinking the array size of nr and targets
> to NR_LRU_LISTS - 1. No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index a6e60c78d058..ebd8ffb63673 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -2862,8 +2862,9 @@ static bool can_age_anon_pages(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
>
> static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
> {
> - unsigned long nr[NR_LRU_LISTS];
> - unsigned long targets[NR_LRU_LISTS];
> + /* LRU_UNEVICTABLE is not taken into account. */
> + unsigned long nr[NR_LRU_LISTS - 1];
> + unsigned long targets[NR_LRU_LISTS - 1];
This looks like a problem waiting to happen..
