On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 2:33 PM Ivan Babrou <ivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 7:40 PM Ivan Babrou <ivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 6:50 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 04:48:00PM -0800, Ivan Babrou wrote: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > Looks like you were right that targeted flush is not going to be as good. > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot. Can you please try the following patch (independent of other > > > patches) as well? > > > > Sure thing, I'll come back with the numbers tomorrow. > > Measurements from different configurations: [...] > avg = 403261 nsecs, total: 30037729036 nsecs, count: 74487 > > Looks like there are plenty of longer pauses still. Thanks for running this. > > I can also get the numbers from 5.10 for you if you want. Yes please, that would be good to compare with. Also I am going to send a new patch in a couple of minutes for you to try and you don't need to run the "Targeted flush" and the last one which reduces the memcg_vmstats size.
