On 1/4/22 14:35, Axel Rasmussen wrote: > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 6:17 PM Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Looks functionally correct to me besides the one style gripe, > > Reviewed-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks Axel! The userfaultfd test is not so easy to follow. While looking at this, I noticed that we skip the mremap() testing for hugetlb. However, Mina recently added hugetlb mremap support. Unfortunately, mremap hugetlb testing fails if enabled. I am still trying to determine the root cause, but would like to eliminate this special case if possible. -- Mike Kravetz
