On 12/20/11 18:07, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 05:14:18PM -0800, Frank Rowand wrote: < snip > >> And for embedded and for real-time, some of us do not want cgroups to be >> a mandatory thing. We want it to remain configurable. My personal >> interest is in keeping the latency of certain critical paths (especially >> in the scheduler) short and consistent. > > Much thanks for your input! That would be quite strong argument for going > with /dev/mem_notify approach. Do you have any specific numbers how cgroups > makes scheduler latencies worse? Sorry, I don't have specific numbers. And the numbers would be workload specific anyway. -Frank -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>