Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 09:43:32 +0000
Cc: Alexey Avramov <hakavlad@xxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>, Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>, regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20211201172920.GA8492@magnolia>
References: <20211125151853.8540-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net> <20211127011246.7a8ac7b8@mail.inbox.lv> <20211129150117.GO3366@techsingularity.net> <20211201010348.31e99637@mail.inbox.lv> <20211130172754.GS3366@techsingularity.net> <20211201033836.4382a474@mail.inbox.lv> <20211201140005.GU3366@techsingularity.net> <20211201172920.GA8492@magnolia>
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 09:29:20AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > Again 5.16-rc1 stuttered badly but the new patch was comparable to 5.15.
> > 
> > As my baseline figures are very different to yours due to differences in
> > storage, can you test the following please?
> 
> I don't know if this was directed at me, but I reran my swapfile
> testcase on 5.16-rc3 and found that it had nearly the same runtime as it
> did in 5.15.
> 

Thanks Darrick. Can I add the following?

Tested-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress
  - From: Darrick J. Wong

References:
- [PATCH 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress
  - From: Mel Gorman
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress
  - From: Alexey Avramov
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress
  - From: Mel Gorman
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress
  - From: Alexey Avramov
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress
  - From: Mel Gorman
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress
  - From: Alexey Avramov
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress
  - From: Mel Gorman
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress
  - From: Darrick J. Wong

Prev by Date: [linux-next:master 3963/4921] arch/sparc/kernel/led.c:125:44: error: 'led_proc_ops' undeclared; did you mean 'proc_ops'?
Next by Date: [PATCH] mm: ksm: fix use-after-free kasan report in ksm_might_need_to_copy
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]