>After the patch, the test gets killed after roughly 15 seconds which is >the same length of time taken in 5.15. In my tests, the 5.15 still performs much better. New question: is timeout=1 has sense? Will it save CPU?
>After the patch, the test gets killed after roughly 15 seconds which is >the same length of time taken in 5.15. In my tests, the 5.15 still performs much better. New question: is timeout=1 has sense? Will it save CPU?