Hi Gang, On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 11:09:18AM +0800, Gang Li wrote: > Hi Feng: > > I am a little confused: > We have `MPOL_PREFERRED`, why you introduce `MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY` instead of > making `MPOL_PREFERRED` support multiple preferred nodes? Cc Ben and Dave. Actually in the end of this cover letter, there is some explaination about it, qutoed here: " In v1, Andi Kleen brought up reusing MPOL_PREFERRED as the mode for the API. There wasn't consensus around this, so I've left the existing API as it was. I'm open to more feedback here, but my slight preference is to use a new API as it ensures if people are using it, they are entirely aware of what they're doing and not accidentally misusing the old interface. (In a similar way to how MPOL_LOCAL was introduced). In v1, Michal also brought up renaming this MPOL_PREFERRED_MASK. I'm equally fine with that change, but I hadn't heard much emphatic support for one way or another, so I've left that too. " Ben made this as he initiated the patchset, and I agree this can keep the API consistent for user . Also at that time, there was another factor that policy MPOL_PREFERRED and MPOL_LOCAL were coupled tightly together. Thanks, Feng
