Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Introduce multi-preference mempolicy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: feng.tang@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Introduce multi-preference mempolicy
From: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 11:09:18 +0800
Cc: linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1627970362-61305-1-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com>
References: <1627970362-61305-1-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com>
Reply-to: 1627970362-61305-1-git-send-email-feng.tang@xxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2

Hi Feng:

I am a little confused:

We have `MPOL_PREFERRED`, why you introduce `MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY`instead of making `MPOL_PREFERRED` support multiple preferred nodes?


--
Thanks
Gang Li

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Introduce multi-preference mempolicy
  - From: Feng Tang

References:
- [PATCH v7 0/5] Introduce multi-preference mempolicy
  - From: Feng Tang

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] mm/mempolicy: add set_mempolicy_home_node syscall
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress
Previous by thread: [PATCH v7 5/5] mm/mempolicy: unify the create() func for bind/interleave/prefer-many policies
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Introduce multi-preference mempolicy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux