On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:28:14 -0800
Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:49:22 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Because of commit ef6a3c6311, FUSE uses replace_page_cache() instead
> > of add_to_page_cache(). Then, mem_cgroup_cache_charge() is not
> > called against FUSE's pages from splice.
>
> Speaking of ef6a3c6311 ("mm: add replace_page_cache_page() function"),
> may I pathetically remind people that it's rather inefficient?
>
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1109.1/00375.html
>
IIRC, people says inefficient because it uses memcg codes for page-migration
for fixing up accounting. Now, We added replace-page-cache for memcg in
memcg-add-mem_cgroup_replace_page_cache-to-fix-lru-issue.patch
So, I think the problem originally mentioned is fixed.
I'll reconsinder LRU handling optimization after things seems to be good.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>