On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:49:22 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Because of commit ef6a3c6311, FUSE uses replace_page_cache() instead
> of add_to_page_cache(). Then, mem_cgroup_cache_charge() is not
> called against FUSE's pages from splice.
Speaking of ef6a3c6311 ("mm: add replace_page_cache_page() function"),
may I pathetically remind people that it's rather inefficient?
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1109.1/00375.html
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>