On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:12:58PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > I would prefer to add a new policy (INTERLEAVE_MULTI or so) for this > > instead of a global sysctl, that takes the additional parameter. > > That would require a change of all scripts and code that uses > MPOL_INTERLEAVE. Lets not do that. Yes, but setting a sysctl would need the same right? It's not clear that all workloads want this. With a global switch only you cannot set it case by case. -Andi -- ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>