On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Andi Kleen wrote: > I would prefer to add a new policy (INTERLEAVE_MULTI or so) for this > instead of a global sysctl, that takes the additional parameter. That would require a change of all scripts and code that uses MPOL_INTERLEAVE. Lets not do that. > Also I don't like having more per task state. Could you compute this > from the address instead even for the process policy case? That sounds good. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>