Re: [PATCH 03/62] mm: Split slab into its own type

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 08:44:39AM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> A clearer overarching design proposal that exists in more than one
> head, that people agree on, and that is concrete enough to allow
> others to make educated guesses on how random snippets of code would
> or should look like in the new world, would help immensely.
> 
> (This applies here, but to a certain degree to folio as well.)

Folios really are a simple design proposal: They're a page which is not
a tail page.  I didn't want to do any of this work on slabs and, and,
and, and.  I want to get back to working on large pages in the page cache.

Yes, the same principles can also be used to split new types (such
as slab) out of struct page, but I don't want to be working on any of
that!  I don't even want to be working on separately allocated memory
descriptors.

I agree it's a lot less churn to split slab out of page first, then
convert the remaining page users to folios than it is to convert sl[aou]b
to folios, then later split it apart into its own type.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux