Re: [PATCH] mm/page_isolation: don't putback unisolated page

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/7/21 2:56 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
...
If this can be handled gracefully, then I'd rather go with VM_WARN_ON.
Maybe even WARN_ON_ONCE?


I think either VM_BUG_ON() or VM_WARN_ON() -- compiling the runtime checks out -- should be good enough.

I'd just go with VM_BUG_ON(), because anybody messing with __isolate_free_page() should clearly spot that we expect the current handling. But no strong opinion.


If in doubt, WARN*() should be preferred over BUG*(). There's a pretty long
history of "don't kill the machine unless you have to" emails about this, let
me dig up one...OK, maybe not the best example, but the tip of the iceberg:

http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1610.0/00878.html

thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux