Re: [PATCH] mm/page_isolation: don't putback unisolated page

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06.09.21 14:45, Miaohe Lin wrote:
On 2021/9/6 20:11, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 06.09.21 14:02, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 04.09.21 11:18, Miaohe Lin wrote:
If __isolate_free_page() failed, due to zone watermark check, the page is
still on the free list. But this page will be put back to free list again
via __putback_isolated_page() now. This may trigger page->flags checks in
__free_one_page() if PageReported is set. Or we will corrupt the free list
because list_add() will be called for pages already on another list.

Fixes: 3c605096d315 ("mm/page_alloc: restrict max order of merging on isolated pageblock")
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
    mm/page_isolation.c | 6 ++----
    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c
index 9bb562d5d194..7d70d772525c 100644
--- a/mm/page_isolation.c
+++ b/mm/page_isolation.c
@@ -93,10 +93,8 @@ static void unset_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, unsigned migratetype)
                buddy_pfn = __find_buddy_pfn(pfn, order);
                buddy = page + (buddy_pfn - pfn);
    -            if (!is_migrate_isolate_page(buddy)) {
-                __isolate_free_page(page, order);
-                isolated_page = true;
-            }
+            if (!is_migrate_isolate_page(buddy))
+                isolated_page = !!__isolate_free_page(page, order);
            }
        }

Thanks!

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>


To make the confusion perfect (sorry) :D I tripple-checked:

In unset_migratetype_isolate() we check that is_migrate_isolate_page(page) holds, otherwise we return.

We call __isolate_free_page() only for such pages.

__isolate_free_page() won't perform watermark checks on is_migrate_isolate().

Consequently, __isolate_free_page() should never fail when called from unset_migratetype_isolate()

If that's correct then we  could instead maybe add a VM_BUG_ON() and a comment why this can't fail.


Makes sense or am I missing something?

I think you're right. __isolate_free_page() should never fail when called from unset_migratetype_isolate()
as explained by you. But it might be too fragile to reply on the failure conditions of __isolate_free_page().
If that changes, VM_BUG_ON() here might trigger unexpectedly. Or am I just over-worried as failure conditions
of __isolate_free_page() can hardly change?

Maybe

isolated_page = !!__isolate_free_page(page, order);
/*
 * Isolating a free page in an isolated pageblock is expected to always
 * work as watermarks don't apply here.
 */
VM_BUG_ON(isolated_page);


VM_BUG_ON() allows us to detect any issues when testing. Combined with the comment it tells everybody messing with __isolate_free_page() what we expect in this function.

In production system, we would handle it gracefully.

--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb






[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux