Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: mmap_lock: add ip to mmap_lock tracepoints

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Steven! Sorry to bother you ;)

(I resend this email because the last one was not cc to mailing list.)

It has been ten days since my last email. What's your opinion about my patch "[PATCH 3/3] mm: mmap_lock: add ip to mmap_lock tracepoints"? Briefly, lock events are so frequent that ip collection and lock event collection cannot be separated, otherwise it will cause the wrong order of data.

I am developing a tool to analyze mmap_lock contend using this feature. Adding ip to mmap_lock tracepoints is quite convenient.

Sorry to bother you again. Hoping for your reply. Thanks!

-- Gang

On 8/20/21 2:18 AM, Gang Li wrote:
> On 8/2/21 10:44 AM, Gang Li wrote:
>> On 7/31/21 4:03 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>> Yes, synthetic events are just like normal events, and have triggers,
>>> stack traces, and do pretty much anything that another event can do.
>>>
> Hi!
>
> I find that sometimes the output data is out of order, which leads to inaccurate time stamps and make it hard to analyze.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux