On 11/22/2011 11:27 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 02:00:24AM -0800, David Rientjes wrote: >> On Tue, 22 Nov 2011, Dave Young wrote: >> >>> [ 0.000000] Linux version 3.2.0-rc2+ (dave@darkstar) (gcc version >>> 4.5.2 (GCC) ) #256 SMP >>> [ 0.000000] Command line: ro root=/dev/mapper/vg_dellper71001-lv_root >>> rd_LVM_LV=vg_dellp >>> [ 0.000000] KERNEL supported cpus: >>> [ 0.000000] Intel GenuineIntel >>> [ 0.000000] AMD AuthenticAMD >>> [ 0.000000] Centaur CentaurHauls >>> [ 0.000000] BIOS-provided physical RAM map: >>> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 0000000000000100 - 00000000000a0000 (usable) >>> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 00000000cf379000 (usable) >>> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 00000000cf379000 - 00000000cf38f000 (reserved) >>> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 00000000cf38f000 - 00000000cf3ce000 (ACPI data) >>> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 00000000cf3ce000 - 00000000d0000000 (reserved) >>> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 00000000e0000000 - 00000000f0000000 (reserved) >>> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 00000000fe000000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) >>> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 0000000100000000 - 0000000630000000 (usable) >>> [ 0.000000] last_pfn = 0x630000 max_arch_pfn = 0x400000000 >>> [ 0.000000] NX (Execute Disable) protection: active >>> [ 0.000000] user-defined physical RAM map: >>> [ 0.000000] user: 0000000000000000 - 0000000000010000 (reserved) >>> [ 0.000000] user: 0000000000010000 - 00000000000a0000 (usable) >>> [ 0.000000] user: 0000000003090000 - 000000000affb000 (usable) >>> [ 0.000000] user: 00000000cf379000 - 00000000cf38f000 (reserved) >>> [ 0.000000] user: 00000000cf38f000 - 00000000cf3ce000 (ACPI data) >>> [ 0.000000] user: 00000000cf3ce000 - 00000000d0000000 (reserved) >>> [ 0.000000] user: 00000000e0000000 - 00000000f0000000 (reserved) >>> [ 0.000000] user: 00000000fe000000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) >>> [ 0.000000] DMI 2.6 present. >>> [ 0.000000] No AGP bridge found >>> [ 0.000000] last_pfn = 0xaffb max_arch_pfn = 0x400000000 >>> [ 0.000000] x86 PAT enabled: cpu 0, old 0x7010600070106, new >>> 0x7010600070106 >>> [ 0.000000] found SMP MP-table at [ffff8800000fe710] fe710 >>> [ 0.000000] Using GB pages for direct mapping >>> [ 0.000000] init_memory_mapping: 0000000000000000-000000000affb000 >>> [ 0.000000] RAMDISK: 0ac79000 - 0afef000 >>> [ 0.000000] ACPI: RSDP 00000000000f1240 00024 (v02 DELL ) >>> [ 0.000000] ACPI: XSDT 00000000000f1344 0009C (v01 DELL PE_SC3 >>> 00000001 DELL 0000000 >>> [ 0.000000] ACPI: FACP 00000000cf3b3f9c 000F4 (v03 DELL PE_SC3 >>> 00000001 DELL 0000000 >>> [ 0.000000] ACPI: DSDT 00000000cf38f000 03D72 (v01 DELL PE_SC3 >>> 00000001 INTL 2005062 >>> [ 0.000000] ACPI: FACS 00000000cf3b6000 00040 >>> [ 0.000000] ACPI: APIC 00000000cf3b3478 0015E (v01 DELL PE_SC3 >>> 00000001 DELL 0000000 >>> [ 0.000000] ACPI: SPCR 00000000cf3b35d8 00050 (v01 DELL PE_SC3 >>> 00000001 DELL 0000000 >>> [ 0.000000] ACPI: HPET 00000000cf3b362c 00038 (v01 DELL PE_SC3 >>> 00000001 DELL 0000000 >>> [ 0.000000] ACPI: DMAR 00000000cf3b3668 001C0 (v01 DELL PE_SC3 >>> 00000001 DELL 0000000 >>> [ 0.000000] ACPI: MCFG 00000000cf3b38c4 0003C (v01 DELL PE_SC3 >>> 00000001 DELL 0000000 >>> [ 0.000000] ACPI: WD__ 00000000cf3b3904 00134 (v01 DELL PE_SC3 >>> 00000001 DELL 0000000 >>> [ 0.000000] ACPI: SLIC 00000000cf3b3a3c 00176 (v01 DELL PE_SC3 >>> 00000001 DELL 0000000 >>> [ 0.000000] ACPI: ERST 00000000cf392ef4 00270 (v01 DELL PE_SC3 >>> 00000001 DELL 0000000 >>> [ 0.000000] ACPI: HEST 00000000cf393164 003A8 (v01 DELL PE_SC3 >>> 00000001 DELL 0000000 >>> [ 0.000000] ACPI: BERT 00000000cf392d74 00030 (v01 DELL PE_SC3 >>> 00000001 DELL 0000000 >>> [ 0.000000] ACPI: EINJ 00000000cf392da4 00150 (v01 DELL PE_SC3 >>> 00000001 DELL 0000000 >>> [ 0.000000] ACPI: SRAT 00000000cf3b3bc0 00370 (v01 DELL PE_SC3 >>> 00000001 DELL 0000000 >>> [ 0.000000] ACPI: TCPA 00000000cf3b3f34 00064 (v02 DELL PE_SC3 >>> 00000001 DELL 0000000 >>> [ 0.000000] ACPI: SSDT 00000000cf3b7000 02A4C (v01 INTEL PPM RCM >>> 80000001 INTL 2006110 >>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 1 -> APIC 0x20 -> Node 0 >>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 2 -> APIC 0x00 -> Node 1 >>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 1 -> APIC 0x34 -> Node 0 >>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 2 -> APIC 0x14 -> Node 1 >>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 1 -> APIC 0x21 -> Node 0 >>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 2 -> APIC 0x01 -> Node 1 >>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 1 -> APIC 0x35 -> Node 0 >>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 2 -> APIC 0x15 -> Node 1 >>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: Node 1 PXM 2 0-d0000000 >>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: Node 1 PXM 2 100000000-330000000 >>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: Node 0 PXM 1 330000000-630000000 >>> [ 0.000000] Initmem setup node 1 0000000000000000-000000000affb000 >>> [ 0.000000] NODE_DATA [000000000aff6000 - 000000000affafff] >> >> blk_throtl_init() is trying to allocate on a specific node and it appears >> like its zonelists were never built successfully. I'd guess it's trying >> to allocate on node 0 since it's not onlined above, probably because this >> is the crashkernel. Your SRAT maps two different nodes but it's only >> onlining node 1 and not node 0. >> >> The problem is that blk_alloc_queue_node() allocs the requeue_queue with >> __GFP_ZERO, which zeros it and never initialized the node field so it >> remains zero. blk_throtl_init() then calls kzalloc_node() on node 0 which >> doesn't have initialized zonelists. >> >> Maybe try this? >> >> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c >> index ea70e6c..99c1881 100644 >> --- a/block/blk-core.c >> +++ b/block/blk-core.c >> @@ -467,6 +467,7 @@ struct request_queue *blk_alloc_queue_node(gfp_t gfp_mask, int node_id) >> q->backing_dev_info.state = 0; >> q->backing_dev_info.capabilities = BDI_CAP_MAP_COPY; >> q->backing_dev_info.name = "block"; >> + q->node = node_id; >> > > Storing q->node info at queue allocation time makes sense to me. In fact > it might make sense to clean it up from blk_init_allocated_queue_node > and assume that passed queue has queue->node set at the allocation time. > > CCing Mike Snitzer who introduced blk_init_allocated_queue_node(). Mike > what do you think. I am not sure it makes sense to pass in nodeid, both > at queue allocation and queue initialization time. To me, it should make > more sense to allocate the queue at one node and that becomes the default > node for reset of the initialization. > > I am wondering why node0 is not coming up in kdump kernel. Assuming that > you must have reserved memory in node0 in first kernel, shouldn't it come > up in second kernel? Vivek, the reserved memory stay in node1 in first kernel also: see following kmsg: SRAT: Node 1 PXM 2 0-d0000000 SRAT: Node 1 PXM 2 100000000-330000000 SRAT: Node 0 PXM 1 330000000-630000000> > Thanks > Vivek > > _______________________________________________ > kexec mailing list > kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec -- Thanks Dave -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>