On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 10:09:25PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > + if (folio_test_error(folio)) > > + folio_set_error(newfolio); > > + if (folio_test_referenced(folio)) > > + folio_set_referenced(newfolio); > > + if (folio_test_uptodate(folio)) > > + folio_mark_uptodate(newfolio); > > + if (folio_test_clear_active(folio)) { > > + VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_unevictable(folio), folio); > > + folio_set_active(newfolio); > > + } else if (folio_test_clear_unevictable(folio)) > > + folio_set_unevictable(newfolio); > > + if (folio_test_workingset(folio)) > > + folio_set_workingset(newfolio); > > + if (folio_test_checked(folio)) > > + folio_set_checked(newfolio); > > + if (folio_test_mappedtodisk(folio)) > > + folio_set_mappedtodisk(newfolio); > > Since a bunch of these are bits in folio->flags and newfolio->flags, I wonder > if it's better to do use a cmpxchg() loop or LL/SC construct to transfer all > the relevant flags in one go. I have plans for that, but they're on hold until the folio work is a bit further progressed. It also helps code that does something like: if (folio_test_dirty(folio) || folio_test_writeback(folio))