On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 10:22:37PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote: > and the page->lru has an address fffffffffffffffc for some reasons. Does it sound like some error code > had not been handled properly and had been propagated here instead? I tried reverting a few recent > commits for mm/hugetlb.c and mm/memblock.c without luck so far. Yes, ff..fc is going to be at offset 8 from the actual address, so that's -12 and -12 is ... #define ENOMEM 12 /* Out of memory */ so something's returning ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) instead of NULL. > [ 8107.262232][T62705] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffffffffffffffc These logs would be a lot easier to read if you snipped the irrelevant timestamp and whatever this Txxxxx thing is.
