On 10/12/2011 08:01 PM, David Rientjes wrote: >> I understand what you concern. But in some area such as banking, >> > stock exchange, train/power/plant control sysemts etc this kind >> > of tunable is welcomed because they can tune their systems at >> > their own risk. >> > > You haven't tried the patch that increases the priority of kswapd when > such a latency sensitive thread triggers background reclaim? No, not yet. I'll try it. Thanks, Satoru -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href