RE: [PATCH -v2 -mm] add extra free kbytes tunable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/11/2011 04:54 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:23:22 -0400
> Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Also, if we increase the free-page reserves a.k.a min_free_kbytes, 
>> the possibility of direct reclaim on other workloads increases.
>> I think it's a bad side effect.
> 
> extra_free_kbytes has the same side-effect.

I don't think so. If we make low watermark bigger to increase
free-page reserves by extra_free_kbytes, the possibility of
direct reclaim on other workload does not increase directly
because min watermark is not changed. 
Of course, as David pointed out, other workloads may incur
a regression because kswapd uses more cpu time.

Thanks,
Satoru

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]