Srikar, I am still reading this series, need more time to read this patch, but: On 09/27, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > > I did a rethink and implemented this patch a little differently using > block_all_signals, unblock_all_signals. This wouldnt need the > #ifdeffery + no changes in kernel/signal.c No, Please don't. block_all_signals() must be killed. This interface simply do not work. At all. It is buggy as hell. I guess I should ping David Airlie again. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>