On Mon 08-03-21 14:22:12, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 08.03.21 13:49, Michal Hocko wrote: [...] > > Earlier in the discussion I have suggested dynamic debugging facility. > > Documentation/admin-guide/dynamic-debug-howto.rst. Have you tried to > > look into that direction? > > Did you see the previous mail this is based on: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YEEUq8ZRn4WyYWVx@xxxxxxxxxx > > I agree that "nofail" is misleading. Rather something like > "dump_on_failure", just a better name :) Yeah, I have read through the email thread. I just do not get why we cannot make it pr_debug() and add -DDYNAMIC_DEBUG_MODULE for page_alloc.c (I haven't checked whether that is possible for built in compile units, maybe it is not but from a quick seems it should). I really do not like this to be a part of the API. alloc_contig_range is a best effort allocator. Complaining about failure is too noisy. I do agree that some sort of easy to enable debugging is due but please let's make it as transparent to the code as possible. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs