Re: Why isn't shrink_slab more zone oriented ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 05:21:12PM +0530, kautuk.c @samsung.com wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I was going through the do_try_to_free_pages(), balance_pgdat(),
> __zone_reclaim()
> functions and I see that shrink_zone and shrink_slab are called for each zone.
> 
> But, shrink_slab() doesn't seem to bother about the zone from where it
> is freeing
> memory.

Work is in progress to do this.

http://lwn.net/Articles/456071/

Dirty slab objects are currently not tracked in a manner that makes
per-zone reclaim efficient to do, os that needs to be corrected
first.  Once we have generic per-zone LRU infrastructure, then we
can easily push zone reclaim hints down into the shrinkers for them
to scan the appropriate LRU....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]