On Tue 27-09-11 15:23:04, Shaohua Li wrote: [...] > Index: linux/mm/vmscan.c > =================================================================== > --- linux.orig/mm/vmscan.c 2011-09-27 13:46:31.000000000 +0800 > +++ linux/mm/vmscan.c 2011-09-27 15:09:29.000000000 +0800 > @@ -2565,7 +2565,9 @@ loop_again: > sc.nr_reclaimed += reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab; > total_scanned += sc.nr_scanned; > > - if (nr_slab == 0 && !zone_reclaimable(zone)) > + if (nr_slab == 0 && !zone_reclaimable(zone) && > + !zone_watermark_ok_safe(zone, order, > + high_wmark_pages(zone) + balance_gap, 0, 0)) Hardcoded ZONE_DMA for zone_watermark_ok_safe? Shouldn't this be i for classzone_idx? > zone->all_unreclaimable = 1; > } > -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs SUSE LINUX s.r.o. Lihovarska 1060/12 190 00 Praha 9 Czech Republic -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>