Re: AMD SEV-SNP/Intel TDX: validation of memory pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 04:19:22PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> That's the thing, we don't want #VE to happen in noinstr code *ever*.
> 
> noinstr covers the whole entry code, things like the syscall gap and nmi
> recursion setup. Getting a #VE there is fail.

I don't know the details about TDX and #VE, but could a malicious HV not
trigger a #VE basically everywhere by mapping around pages? So 'fail'
means panic() in this case, right?

> So most per-cpu data can be on-demand, but some of it must absolutely
> not be.

The kernel can validate those itself in the early setup code, the
decompressor shouldn't care about those details.

Regards,

	Joerg




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux