On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 09:52:53PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 9:34 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 02:23:33PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > On 01.02.21 12:56, Yafang Shao wrote: ... > > > Printing that in addition to the raw value could be helpful. Just some > > > thoughts. > > > > printf() buffer is not a black hole, esp. when you get it messed with critical > > messages (Oops). I suggest to reduce a burden as much as possible. If you wish > > to get this, make it caller-configurable, i.e. adding another letter to the > > specifier. > > > > I think David's suggestion will help us to identify issues. > > You mean that we should use another one like "%pGpd" - means pGp debug > - to implement it ? Yes. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
