Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] Basic kernel memory functionality for the Memory Controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/18/2011 05:39 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 04:11:21PM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
On 09/18/2011 04:05 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:39:12AM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
Always zero in root cgroup?

Yes, if we're not accounting, it should be zero. WARN_ON, maybe?

-ENOSYS?

I'd personally prefer WARN_ON. It is good symmetry from userspace PoV to
always be able to get a value out of it. Also, it something goes wrong
and it is not zero for some reason, this will help us find it.

What's the point to get non-relevant value?
What about -ENOSYS + WARN_ON?

Well,

what about not even registering kernel memory files for !root cgroup?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]