On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 03:40:13PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Does the stuff in hmm.c need updating too?
>
> if (!pte_present(pte)) {
> swp_entry_t entry = pte_to_swp_entry(pte);
This idea should be cross-tree, so yes.. even if I'm not 100% sure whether HMM
would be a good candidate for file-backed uffd-wp, I agree we should also take
care of those.
I guess I managed to take care of all the is_swap_pte() callers but forget I
should also look for pte_to_swp_entry() users too, since sometimes pte_none()
and pte_present() is checked separately, so there're quite a few places that I
should have taken care of but got lost. HMM is one of them.
Thanks for spotting this, Jason. I'll coordinate in the next version.
--
Peter Xu
